Archive for the ‘Government’ Category

bad profits

April 8, 2010 in | Comments (0)

Posted by Sandy Hutchens

http://changents.com/files/imagecache/media_slideshow_player/vids_and_pics/drilling-profits-bad-company.jpg

Too many companies can’t tell the difference between good profits and bad. The consequences are disastrous. Bad profits choke off a company’s best opportunities for true, lasting growth. They blacken its reputation and make it vulnerable to competitors.

By “bad profits” we mean profits earned at the expense of customer relationships. Whenever a customer feels mistreated, those profits are bad. Bad profits come from unfair or misleading pricing, saving money by delivering a poor customer experience, or extracting value from customers rather than creating value. At many firms, more than 30% of customers fall under the category of bad profits.

Good profits are dramatically different. A company earns good profits when it so delights its customers that they not only willingly come back for more, but they also tell others to do business with the company. Satisfied customers become, in effect, part of the company’s marketing department. They become promoters.

A simple technique can help you distinguish good profits from bad. Ask your customers to answer what we call “the ultimate question”: On a scale from zero to 10, how likely is it that you would recommend this company to a friend or a colleague? The responses will help you tally a metric known as Net Promoter® Score (NPSSM). NPS has been shown to correlate well not only with customer referrals and repurchases, but also with companies’ growth rates.

Customer responses cluster into three groups. The first group-customers who give the company a nine or 10-we call promoters. Customers in the second group, which rates the company at seven or eight, are “passively satisfied.” Detractors, with ratings from zero to six, make up the third group. A company’s NPS is simply the percentage of promoters minus the percentage of detractors.

Bain has found that companies with the leading NPS in an industry usually enjoy superior growth-typically, more than 2.5 times the average growth rate of the competition.

How can a company raise its NPS? First, by designing the right propositions for the right customers. A vital step toward clarifying your priorities is to quantify the average lifetime value of your company’s promoters and detractors, factoring in margins, annual spend, cost efficiency, and referrals. Another step that will help is to map your customers onto the grid illustrated in Figure 1.

High-profit promoters, in the upper right, love doing business with you. These customers should be your top long-term priority for strategic investment and innovation. Your entire organization should focus on delivering flawlessly to them. Too often, however, customers in this sector are taken for granted (no squeaky wheels here). Inadvertently, companies may be milking profitable promoters to fund solutions for less-profitable customers.

In the 1980s, American Express took the healthy profits from its core travel-card business and financed an expansion into financial services. Within the card division, margins from high-volume customers subsidized the acquisition of new customers outside the core business. Predictably, American Express’s growth and profits tailed off…until it revitalized compelling propositions for core customers. For example, the company transformed its Membership Miles program into Membership Rewards, one of the industry’s most generous rewards programs, and created the Rewards Plus Gold card, now one of its most popular products.

High-profit detractors, in the upper left corner, should be the second priority. They don’t like doing business with you and are telling others. They will likely defect at the first opportunity.

A mobile-phone provider found that many accounts in this sector were locked into long-term contracts at fixed prices. When these prices became uncompetitive, the customers were furious. The fix was easy: Offer more favorable terms in advance of renewal. That cost money, but holding angry customers hostage would’ve cost even more.

Moving more customers into the upper right sector should be your third priority. Begin by looking for ways to

encourage low-profit promoters to do more business with you. Amazon.com, for example, began to use personal
recommendations and incentives such as premium shipping to do this. You’ll also have to figure out what would win over the passives, and then calculate whether such investments make sense or would merely “steal” resources away from your core.

Leading companies like GE, Intuit, and American Express are now deploying NPS and discovering how versatile it is. Like any good metric, NPS allows experimentation and accelerates learning. It helps you understand your core customers and design propositions that captivate them-and discover opportunities to deliver a great customer experience at every touchpoint. By producing NPS data regularly, you’ll institutionalize a cultural shift, making customer metrics every bit as auditable and practical as financial metrics such as profit and return on equity. You’ll develop your capability to keep turning customers into advocates that lead your company to lasting growth. And it all starts by asking just one question.

Canada Whistleblower to Get Paid

February 10, 2010 in | Comments (0)

Canadian Whistleblower Richard Colvin will get paid

Canadian Whistleblower Richard Colvin will get paid by the federal government for the diplomat’s legal fees. Richard Colvin is the Canadian who blew the whistle on alleged Afghan prisoner abuse.

At the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade an official said that two invoices from Mr. Colvin’s previous lawyer, in the amount of $20,000, are being paid and payment for a third invoice, which was submitted in December, has been met with approval.

Additional funds have also been set aside to a maximum of $50,000, to pay potential and additional legal expenses, according to Joffre LeBlanc.

In a letter sent to the Military Police Complaints Commission, Mr. Colvin’s Toronto attorney, Owen Rees, said his client believed the Canadian government was refusing to pay his legal bills as payback for Mr. Colvin’s revelations before a special House of Commons committee in the fall.

Mr. Rees said the government was basically not paying Mr. Colvin’s legal fees after his testimony.

Mr. Colvin, currently an intelligence officer at the Canadian embassy in Washington, revealed to the Canada committee that several senior government officials were aware that Canadian Forces in Afghanistan were handing over detainees to face likely torture by Afghani authorities in 2006 – 2007.

His allegations rocked the government and led to furious denials from generals, former generals and cabinet ministers, including Defence Minister Peter MacKay, who questioned Mr. Colvin’s credibility.

Conservative MPs on the Afghan committee made claims that Mr. Colvin had been a victim of fraud by Taliban propaganda.

Liberal defence critic Ujjal Dosanjh says it is ridiculous that Mr. Colvin has had to fight so hard to retain independent legal representation, and he doesn’t believe the department was merely slow to respond to the request for money.

“The Harper Conservatives did not hesitate to pay former prime minister Brian Mulroney’s legal fees,” said Mr. Dosanjh. “Taxpayers paid over $2-million to cover Mr. Mulroney’s legal costs at the inquiry into his dealings with [German-Canadian businessman] Karlheinz Schreiber.”

A spokesman for the Prime Minister’s Office suggested politics played no role in either case. “In both cases, the decision to reimburse legal fees was taken at the departmental level,” Andrew MacDougall said.

At this time, two of the three opposition parties claim they’ve heard the government will not restart the committee on Afghanistan once Canadian Parliament returns from its forced hiatus. The committee is where the most attrocious revelations about the treatment of Afghan prisoners have been revealed.

Prime Minister Harper’s decision to prorogue Parliament dissolved all committees. It would take the unanimity from all parties in the House of Commons to re-start the opposition-dominated committee.

However a spokesman for the Prime Minister’s Office said opposition parties are making a fuss about nothing.

“Afghanistan remains a public policy priority, and the special committee on Afghanistan will be reconstituted once the new session begins,” deputy press secretary Andrew MacDougall said Wednesday.

New Democratic MP Paul Dewar was cynical about this. “They shut down Parliament,” said Mr. Dewar, the party’s foreign affairs critic. “I don’t put anything past them. They could kill a committee. That’s nothing.”

The Liberal Party is also critical, but Bloc Québécois defence critic Claude Bachand seemed prepared to give the Tories the benefit of the doubt. “I don’t think they can stop the committee,” said Mr. Bachand.

Demands made by opposition committee members to see uncensored documentation in December created a standoff with the Conservative government.

The Liberals introduced a motion demanding that the records be put forward; failing that, Mr. MacKay could be called before the “bar” in Parliament to respond to questions, and could even be removed from his seat if found in contempt.

General Rick Hillier – Colvin Testimony on Detainee Torture Ludicrous

Whistleblower concerns complicate Hydro rate-hike hearing

February 8, 2010 in | Comments (0)

The confusing regulatory mess

A whistleblower complaint got a little messy Tuesday morning as lawyers argued about whether Manitobans should pay higher power rates while things get sorted out.

Manitoba Hydro did ask the Public Utilities Board for a 2.9 per cent rate hike effective April 1. But it’s clear the “mega-hearing” needed to determine whether Hydro deserves a rate increase will take months longer than that, especially if the whistleblower’s concerns over Hydro’s financial and power supply risks spark an entirely separate hearing.

In the meantime, the PUB is considering whether Hydro needs more money from homeowners now – perhaps a 2.9 per cent hike, or something less than that.

But some intervenors at Tuesday’s hearing said Hydro shouldn’t be rewarded for stalling the regulatory process and releasing only a trickle of documents. The province’s big corporate power users said giving Hydro a rate hike without a real hearing would set an “injurious and unprincipled precedent.”

Whistleblower asks Manitoba Hydro about $160 million

Hydro argued it needed modest and regular rate hikes to maintain its good financial picture.

Meanwhile, at the downtown courthouse, Hydro began an appeal to force the whistleblower to hand over her reports to KPMG, another consulting firm Hydro has hired to test the whistleblower’s findings that Hydro could face bankruptcy and blackouts.

Yet another hearing is likely later this week to discuss a ban on publication.